Rewriting Possibility: 77%
English Social Criticism in Fahrenheit 451 Social criticism is very important in society today. Most people in our society encounter social criticism on a daily basis! Television shows like Saturday Night Live, discuss social issues on just about every episode. Social criticism is important to have though, because it keeps our society in check, so we know what is right and what is wrong, based on opinions. In the book Fahrenheit 451 , author Ray Bradbury socially criticizes many different things.
Two of the things he criticizes many times are censorship and politics. Ray Bradbury socially criticizes censorship in his book, Fahrenheit 451. At one point during the story, Guy Montage, the main character, and his wife, Mildred, are talking about a time when Montage burnt a woman to death because she would not give up her books. Montage felt guilty and told Mildred, “There must be something in books, things we can’t imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house; there must be something there. You do not stay for nothing’ (Bradbury 51).
Bradbury is criticizing censorship here, because it is the cause of a woman’s death. If books were legal, this woman would still be living a normal life. Since books are illegal in this town, and Montage now defends books, Bradbury probably thinks banning books is ridiculous! At one point in this story Montage is very frustrated, he says to Faber, a retired English professor, “l just want someone to hear what have to say. And maybe if I talk long enough, it’ll make sense” (Bradbury 82). Montage is frustrated that he cannot write down his feelings, because that is illegal.
Bradbury is criticizing the fact that when someone is mad, and needs to vent ND write down their thoughts, they cannot do that, due to that fact that it is illegal because of censorship. Montage finally realizes how pointless it was to burn books. He says to him self, ‘The sun burnt everyday. It burnt time. The world rushed in a circle and turned on its axis and time was busy burning the years and the people anyway, without any help from him. So if he burnt things with the firemen and the sun burnt time, that meant everything burnt! One of them had to stop burning. The sun wouldn’t, certainly.
So it looked as if it had to be Montage’ (Bradbury 141). Guy Montage realizes that the sun burnt everything in the world, while the firemen burnt books. He knows that the sun will not stop burning, so he might as well stop burning books! Bradbury is again criticizing here how pointless it is for someone to burn books. Bradbury is saying that there are way too many other things in the world being burnt, so why burn books. Although Bradbury socially criticizes censorship many times, he also criticizes other things as well. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury socially criticizes politics.
Montage rises to have a conversation with his wife’s friends about who they voted for in the last election, and Mrs.. Bowels says, “l laid it on the line for President Noble. Think he’s one of the nicest looking men ever became president” (Bradbury 96). This causes Montage to become furious, because he thinks it is ridiculous to vote for a man based on looks. This is criticism towards politics because Bradbury thinks that many people do not know anything about the person they vote for, they just vote for them because they look cool, or are attractive.
Bradbury also criticizes the fact that people get unhappy about ileitis pretty easily. Captain Beauty says to Montage, “If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides of a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none” (Bradbury 61). Bradbury is criticizing politics here because he is saying that people get influenced very easy. If a man hears јo sides of a story, he will start to worry and not know what side to take. If a man has only one side of a story then sure, they will be fine.
What Bradbury is criticizing here about politics is that people need to make their wan decisions, not make a decision on whom they like or what they support just based off one thing they hear. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 , author Ray Bradbury socially criticizes many different things. He socially criticizes censorship and politics, many times. Bradbury criticism Was very good though, censorship should be banned everywhere, where as everything he criticized about politics was also true. There are many other problems with our society today. A question to keep in mind though; is our society not as bad as Bradbury makes it seem?
Fahrenheit 451 introduces a new society in which the population is plagued with sameness. Individuality is not accepted and an intellectual is outlawed. Instead of a fireman preventing fires, they are now seen as the flame thrower, destroying books which are considered evil because they make people stop and think. Everyone enjoys the same: nature and watching N. With this plot, Bradbury raises the idea that man should think for himself as opposed to letting the government or the television do it for us. Me must all be alike.
Not everyone born free and equal, as the constitution says, but everyone made equal A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man’s mind. ” Captain Beauty says this as he explains the revisionist history of firemen to Montage. During his speech, he was undoubtedly ironic, using his profound knowledge to manipulate Montage. He was willing to defend the “equality” of society while still remaining educated, which raises the question of whether he truly agrees with this society. Montage is TABLE to snag books due to his work as a fireman.
Beauty is in the same line of work as Montage. Perhaps Captain Beauty took on he work as a fireman to gain legal access to books through his position of authority. That said, Captain Beauty may very well be a representation of rebellion which further supports Bradbury idea of man having their own thoughts. The author seems to suggest that if individuality is oppressed then its man’s job to think and act on it. “Maybe the books can get us half out of the cave. They just might stop us from making the same damn insane mistakes! Montage sees books not only as helpful tools but as vital cures for his diseased world. What this quote suggests is that the consensus people have a fear of learning and instead eave it to the hands of the government. People are weak minded and in the dark about things, as Montage indicates when he says ‘Maybe books can get us half out of the cave. ‘ Since they don’t think, they need something that occupies their time. This is where television comes into play. However, that raises more problems itself such as depression and suicide.
Thus, Bradbury believes that instead of putting our brains into the hands of the government and television, we should expand our knowledge with history and books. It is necessary for a society that doesn’t want to repeat the same mistakes. Go home and think of your first husband divorced and your second husband killed in a jet and your third husband blowing his brains out, go home and think of the dozen abortions you’ve had, go home and think of that and your damn Caesarian sections, too, and your children who hate your guts!
Go home and think how it all happened and what did you ever do to Stop it? ” Montage says this when Mrs.. Bowels rejects his “poetry lesson” and he can no longer restrain himself from voicing her ignorance. This suggests that a person lacks feeling when they also lack the ability to think. This topic was roughs up in the beginning of the book when Claries, Montage neighbor, told him that he was not in love. Montage exclaimed that he was in love with his wife but after he thought about it, he realized he was not.
And he was sure that she was not either. This further supports the idea that feeling brings change. With the extermination of intellect and therefore feeling, the government is sure to stay in the dyspepsia it has become. However, if intellectuals were to take a rise, their depressing society would change. Therefore, Bradbury encourages learning and reading in order to realize whether we think something is right or wrong.